The “Let it happen” theory presidents have used to change public opinion. DO NOT FALL FOR IT FOR THE 3rd TIME

“Did the U.S. leadership know something was coming, and let it happen (or didn’t stop it) because they knew the public wouldn’t support war otherwise?”

1. Pearl Harbor – “Let it happen” theory (1941)

The Official Story:

Japan surprise-attacked Pearl Harbor, killing over 2,400 Americans. This galvanized the U.S. to declare war the next day.

The Theory (with supporting evidence):

• U.S. intelligence had intercepted Japanese communications via “Magic” code-breaking — including hints about a coming attack.

• FDR had been trying to get the U.S. into WWII but faced strong public opposition (80% against war in early 1941).

• Some historians argue FDR allowed the attack to happen, knowing it would unify the country.

• The Pacific fleet was not on high alert, despite clear signs Japan was preparing for war.

Key Point:

Whether intentional or not, Pearl Harbor gave FDR exactly what he needed — unanimous support for war and a clear enemy.

2. 9/11 – “Known threat” theory (2001)

The Official Story:

Al-Qaeda hijacked planes and struck the U.S., prompting the War on Terror and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The Theory (based on released intelligence):

• The CIA warned the Bush administration repeatedly in summer 2001: “Bin Laden determined to strike in U.S.” (August 6th PDB).

• NSA and FBI also had bits of info on hijackers being in the country.

• Some argue the Bush administration focused more on Iraq and ignored the threat — or let it “fall through the cracks” until it was useful.

• After 9/11, support for war soared, giving Bush a blank check for massive military campaigns.

🧠 Key Point:

9/11 became the “Pearl Harbor” of the 21st century — and shaped two decades of war, surveillance, and U.S. foreign policy.